I have been looking at Sirius(S) offerings verses Xm(X). Since i pay for XM streaming (free trial) and i also own several XM radios for going on 3 years now. But recently i have been looking at sirius, using the free trial. I have three days and will post my findings each day.
Initial reaction to (S) web site is much better then (X) its much cleaner and you can find things faster. (X) has better channel pages and better layout for the content of the shows. But i see it as messy and hard to navigate sometimes. The streaming for (S) is MUCH better. XM needs to fix re do and clean up the whole streaming service. it pales in comparison. (S) is nothing great at all but when you compare the two favour is in (S).
One strength of the Sirius streaming is that it’s clean and wont pop/click or drop out. XM seems to have a issue with bandwidth on there end that prevents a clean stream. Its enough to make you want to quit. Sirius is also free streaming with subscription and XM is $4 a month extra. Now i have no issue with the $4 a month i like that they make people who want the service pay for it, not everyone. However if i am paying for it make it work correctly!!! I have sent numerous complaints to XM with no response on this issue.
The interface of each stream is the same just a rehash of a API for windows media. Sirius puts in some extra code for “buy this cd” and “last 5 songs you heard” so again they win the R/D award for making a product that a user will be happy with. They also offer a “mini” player for paying users. XM none of this r/d in fact its getto flash that crashes a lot.
One more issue that i want to talk about before i leave the stream reviews. is the fact that XM will “disconnect” you if you have been in-active for a long period of time. THIS IS HORRIBLE. i cant tell you how much it will piss you off. The point of streaming audio is to listen to it at work etc. i am not going to change channels every 2 hours. why kick me off?!?! its horrible and they need to stop this “protection” its horrible and makes the service really suck. If you dont believe me then just try it out, get into a station for two hours then it will kick you out. By the time you figure out how to log back into the service and choose your channel. Wait for the stream to buffer. you lost 5 mins easy of time you could have been listenin’ to sirius streaming.
The big Question the Channels
So essentially it comes down to the content. Its really what your paying for. To set this up i will outline what i listen to on XM. I listen to Channel 9 (90’s music) 20 (Top 20 POP hits) 47 (Today’s Alternative Rock) 53(Punk) 67 (Urban Top40) 82(Techno) 113 (Classical Pops) This is my “basic” music interest. I listen to all the channels mostly equally. I like the 67,113,82,47 the most. Xm streaming has a channel for classic alternative not currently offered on the normal service called Lucy. Its lame they do this and wish they offered it on the full service.
(S) is very similar to XM. if they didn't station ID you wouldn't notice which service you were listening to. its the same format same idea same music more or less. However (S) dj’s seem lame, they are goofy and stupid its like LA radio where they are trying to be goofy.
So with that laid down, i went to (S) and its rather easy to find channels that are similar. The first and foremost that (S) pops ahead of XM on is the techno/electronic music. The channels for techno are VERY good channel 61/63/62 are great and blow the pants off of XM 81/82. Techno music favor is the hand of (S)
Next i listened to the 90’s/Pop chart topers. I think again (S) takes the lead in small bits. but only small. There is no “decades” that xm offers. I like that a lot. You can listen to 60’s music or 90’s music with a channel change. (S) offers 90’s and today channel. Its a huge mix of top 40 and 90’s top 40. This isn't what i want to listen to. So XM pulls ahead in the over all review. However (S) strengths are it seems to not play the same corporate crap that XM forces on you. Also the channel 1on (S) has morning talk shows and its really a 100% music channel. Why not just go to FM for this content? (S) has more channels that match FM radio stations in this area for SURE (which some people might like). XM kids us with crap like MTV channel, but more specialised content channels.
I briefly listened to some of the Hip Hop channels. not in depth. I think that (S) offers a better section of hiphop however i think i like XM better. being a white boy i think XM is sent to a white kid watching mtv more. (S) appears to have a much better stronger and more “full spectrum” of hip-hop/rb/urban. Thats is just personal opinion. There is a lot more “uncensored” hiphop on (S) and honestly i could hear less eminem. There is even a eminem channel. Sorry this is tooooo much eminem/50cent
Conclusion Day 1
- Overall thought of the company = (S) (they arnt owned by clearcom)
- WebSite Ease of use = (S)
- Techno music = (S) (so much better content and choice)
- HipHop old skool = (X) (for a white kid from Seattle)
- Urban40 = (X) (much better live ‘metro-mix’s)
- HipHop/Urban40 choices = (S) (xm is trying to make efforts in this market i noticed)
- 90’s =(X) (decades choices is what its about, and no morning shows)
TrackBack Day2